Summary 2009 WY 84
Summary of Decision issued July 1, 2009
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.
Case Name: McGarvey v. Key Property Management, LLC
Citation: 2009 WY 84
Docket Number: S-08-0194
Appeal from the District Court of Sweetwater County, the Honorable Nena R. James, Judge.
Representing McGarvey: Timothy Kingston, Graves, Miller & Kingston, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Representing Key Property: Kathleen Dixon and Patrick Dixon, Chapin & Dixon, Casper, Wyoming.
Facts/Discussion: McGarvey filed a wrongful termination suit against her employer, claiming she was discharged from her job for reasons that violate public policy. McGarvey worked at a low-income housing facility in Rock Springs. At some point during renovations that were taking place, she organized a meeting for the residents to bring their problems to the attention of the Mayor. McGarvey received a letter noting the “unauthorized tenant meeting” which she “knew would be harmful to the company” shortly prior to her discharge. Her employers maintained there were other legitimate reasons for their decision to terminate her employment as well.
The Court noted that both parties agreed she was an at-will employee. Wyoming recognizes an exception that an employer may incur tort liability if it discharges an employee for reasons that violate public policy. McGarvey’s employers were not state or federal actors and therefore cannot be held liable under the federal constitution. Appellant noted that the free speech provision of the Wyoming constitution is worded differently and asserted it should be interpreted differently than the federal constitutional language. The facts of the Allen case match closely with the instant case. McGarvey’s speech, in which she expressed her negative opinion of her employer and potentially harmed her employer’s relationship with government officials, exceeded the limits of protected speech. The Court did not accept McGarvey’s argument that she was discharged for exercising her right of free speech.
Conclusion: The speech that McGarvey claimed was the reason for her discharge took place in a meeting held during working hours in the offices of her employers’ apartment complex. The speech was not constitutionally protected and her discharge did not violate any well-established public policy.
Affirmed.
J. Burke delivered the decision.
Link: http://tinyurl.com/majq8p .
[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. Please note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you pinpoint cite to a quote, you should cite to this paragraph number rather than to any page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.]
