Summary 2012 WY 57

Summary of Decision April 11, 2012


[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. You will also note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you need to provide a pinpoint citation to a quote the universal portion of the citation will use that paragraph number. The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]

Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court

Case Name: HAILEY JACOBSEN REMMICK v. THE STATE OF WYOMING

Docket Number: No. S-11-0015

URL: http://wyomcases.courts.state.wy.us/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=465348

Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, Honorable Dan R. Price, Judge

Representing Appellant (Plaintiff/Defendant): Diane M. Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. Olson, Appellate Counsel; Eric M. Alden, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel. Argument by Mr. Alden.

Representing Appellee (Plaintiff/Defendant): Bruce Salzburg, Attorney General; Terry L. Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Meri V. Geringer, Senior Assistant Attorney General. Argument by Ms. Geringer.

Date of Decision: April 11, 2012

Facts: Appellant, Hailey Jacobsen Remmick, challenged her conviction of six counts of receiving stolen property and one charge of conspiracy to commit larceny by a bailee. Ms. Remmick claimed that pre-charging delay deprived her of due process of law and that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.

Issues: Ms. Remmick presented two issues: Was Appellant denied due process of law by pre-charging delay? Was the jury verdict supported by sufficient evidence?

Holdings: Affirmed.

Justice Burke delivered the opinion for the court.