Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Summary 2012 WY 75

Summary of Decision May 30, 2012

[SPECIAL NOTE:  This opinion uses the "Universal Citation."  It was given an "official" citation when it was issued.  You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation.  You will also note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered.  When you need to provide a pinpoint citation to a quote the universal portion of the citation will use that paragraph number.  The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] 

Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court

Case Name:  In the Matter of U.S. Currency totaling $7,209.00: Libretti v. State of Wyo.

Citation:  2012 WY 75

Docket Number: S-11-0243   

Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, The Honorable Catherine E. Wilking, Judge

Representing Appellants (Claimants): Joseph Libretti and Frank A. Hohlios, pro se

Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. Delicath, Deputy Attorney General

Date of Decision: May 30, 2012

Facts:  This is an appeal from a forfeiture order entered by the district court against a total of $116,584.43 and certain items of personal property.  The cash and personal property were seized from several individuals because of their alleged use in violation of the Wyoming Controlled Substances Act.  Appellants claimed $7,209.00 of the cash seized. Both timely responded to the Forfeiture Complaint with the filing of motions to dismiss or in the alternative for a more definite statement.  On August 10, 2011, the district court held the evidentiary hearing on the State’s Forfeiture Complaint.  Appellant Libretti appeared by telephone and objected when the court called the hearing as an evidentiary hearing.  Appellant Hohlios attended the hearing, but the court was not aware of his presence.  On August 26, 2011, the district court issued its Forfeiture Order, finding that the funds seized from Appellants were proceeds from violations of the Wyoming Controlled Substances Act. 

Issues:  I) Whether the District Court erred in not ruling on the claimants’ Motion to Dismiss/Motions for more Definite Statement; II) Whether the District Court erred in not allowing claimants to file an Answer, conduct discovery, and file Motions for Summary Judgment; III) Whether the District Court erred in not ruling on, and not granting, Claimants’ Motions for more Definite Statement; IV) Whether claimants were wrongly denied a Jury trial; V) If the August 10, 2011 proceeding was only an evidentiary hearing, as Plaintiff claims, and not a trial, whether the Court then lacked authority to enter its judgment; and VI) Whether claimant Hohlios was unfairly denied his right to be heard at trial.

Holdings:  The Court held that the district court acted in accordance with the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure in ruling on the State’s Forfeiture Complaint and did not deny the rights of Appellants to file answers, conduct discovery, file summary judgment motions, or otherwise fully participate in the proceedings.

The Court affirmed. 

J. Golden delivered the opinion for the court.

No comments:

Check out our tags in a cloud (from Wordle)!