Summary 2012 WY 91
Summary of Decision June 27, 2012
Chief Justice Kite delivered the opinion for the Court. Affirmed.
Case Name: KEVIN EUGENE KIDWELL v. THE STATE OF WYOMING
Docket Number: S-11-0238
URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspx
Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, Honorable W. Thomas Sullins, Judge
Representing Appellant (Plaintiff/Defendant): Diane Lozano, State Public Defender, PDP; Tina N. Olson, Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. Morgan, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel.
Representing Appellee (Plaintiff/Defendant): Gregory A. Phillips, Attorney General; David L. Delicath, Deputy Attorney General; D. Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General.
Date of Decision: June 27, 2012
Facts: Kevin Eugene Kidwell challenged his convictions for false imprisonment and simple assault. He claimed the prosecutor committed misconduct by failing to give prior notice of evidence suggesting he had attempted to persuade a witness to testify falsely in his favor at trial in violation of W.R.E. 404(b).
Issues: Mr. Kidwell presented the following issue on appeal:
Did the prosecutor commit misconduct when he admitted [sic] 404(b) evidence without providing notice?
The State provided a more detailed statement of the issue:
Proposed defense witness, Andrew Scott, abandoned his plan to testify falsely on Kidwell’s behalf and advised the prosecution of both his plan and his change of heart shortly before the end of the noon recess on the third day of trial. Without first notifying defense counsel, the prosecutor called Scott, to repeat his story, as the second witness of the afternoon. Does the record as a whole support the district court’s conclusion that the prosecutor’s omission was neither misconduct nor prejudicial?
Holdings: Mr. Kidwell failed to demonstrate a clear violation of law or any prejudice. Affirmed.
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court
[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. You will also note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you need to provide a pinpoint citation to a quote the universal portion of the citation will use that paragraph number. The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]
No comments:
Post a Comment