Summary 2012 WY 166
Summary of Decision December 28, 2012
Justice Golden delivered the opinion for the Court. Affirmed.
Case Name: DOUGLAS HOWARD CRAFT v. THE STATE OF WYOMING
Docket Number: S‑12‑0030
URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspx
Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, Honorable Michael N. Deegan, Judge
Representing Appellant (Plaintiff/Defendant): Diane Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. Olson, Chief Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. Morgan, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel, Wyoming Public Defender Program. Argument by Mr. Morgan.
Representing Appellee (Plaintiff/Defendant): Gregory A. Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. Delicath, Deputy Attorney General; D. Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General. Argument by Mr. Pauling.
Date of Decision: December 28, 2012
Facts: A jury convicted Appellant Douglas Craft of sexual exploitation of a child. Craft challenges that conviction on two discrete grounds. First, he claims the State presented insufficient evidence proving the elements of the charged crime, and he faults the district court for not granting his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s case-in-chief. Craft also contends the jury’s verdict is tainted by prosecutorial misconduct.
Issues: Craft phrases his issues as follows:
I. Did the district court err when it denied Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, for lack of sufficient evidence?
II. Did the prosecutor commit misconduct when he argued the jury should view an exhibit as substantive proof, after he had previously asserted to the hearsay objection that the exhibit was not being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted?
Holdings: The Court found no reversible error with respect to the issues raised in this appeal and the Court affirms Craft’s conviction.
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court
[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. You will also note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you need to provide a pinpoint citation to a quote the universal portion of the citation will use that paragraph number. The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]
No comments:
Post a Comment