Summary 2013 WY 46
Summary
of Decision April 19, 2013
Justice Hill delivered the opinion for the Court. Affirmed.
Case Name: TRAVIS J. KOVACH v. THE STATE OF WYOMING
Justice Hill delivered the opinion for the Court. Affirmed.
Case Name: TRAVIS J. KOVACH v. THE STATE OF WYOMING
Docket
Number: S-12-0150
URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspx
Appeal from the District Court of Sublette County, Honorable Marvin L. Tyler, Judge.
Representing Appellant: Gerard R. Bosch, Law Offices of Jerry Bosch, Wilson, WY; and Tim Newcomb, Laramie, WY. Argument by Mr. Newcomb.
Representing Appellee: Gregory A. Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. Delicath, Deputy Attorney General; Theodore R. Racines, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Jeffrey Pope, Assistant Attorney General. Argument by Mr. Pope.
Date of Decision:
April 19, 2013
Facts:
Travis Kovach was a passenger in a vehicle traveling on a narrow backcountry
road. As the vehicle in which Kovach was
traveling passed another oncoming vehicle, the two vehicles clipped each other. Kovach pursued the other vehicle, and after
catching up with it, he assaulted the vehicle’s seventy-three-year-old driver
and sixty-seven-year-old passenger.
Kovach then forced the two men back to his hunting camp, where he again
assaulted them.
A
jury found Kovach guilty of numerous charges, including false imprisonment,
felonious restraint and aggravated assault and battery. On appeal, Kovach contended the prosecutor
suppressed exculpatory evidence in violation of his state and federal due
process rights. He also challenged the
district court’s order requiring him to disclose witness statements and its
imposition of sanctions related to that order; alleged misconduct in the
prosecutor’s failure to correct false or misleading testimony; alleged the
district court relied on impermissible information in sentencing; and alleged
the district court erred in sua sponte
issuing an amended judgment correcting the fine imposed against Kovach.
1. Did the prosecutor suppress exculpatory evidence in
violation of Kovach’s federal and state due process rights?
2. Did the district court abuse its discretion and
violate Kovach’s federal and state constitutional rights when it ordered him to
disclose witness statements and then limited his cross-examination of two
prosecution witnesses as a sanction for failure to comply with that order?
3. Did the prosecutor commit plain error in violation of
Kovach’s due process rights by failing to correct the testimony of two
witnesses?
4. Did the district court commit plain error in its
sentencing of Kovach by relying on uncharged misconduct evidence and by sua sponte issuing an amended judgment
correcting the fine imposed against Kovach?
Holdings:
The Court found no violation of Kovach’s constitutional rights in the
prosecutor’s failure to disclose information to the defense or in the district
court’s discovery orders. The Court further found no prosecutorial misconduct,
and no plain error in the court’s sentencing decisions and order. Affirmed.
Summaries
are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming
Supreme Court
[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. You will also note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you need to provide a pinpoint citation to a quote the universal portion of the citation will use that paragraph number. The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]
[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. You will also note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you need to provide a pinpoint citation to a quote the universal portion of the citation will use that paragraph number. The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]
No comments:
Post a Comment